{"id":116,"date":"2015-01-05T16:25:16","date_gmt":"2015-01-05T16:25:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/janbri.nl\/?p=116"},"modified":"2015-01-05T16:32:06","modified_gmt":"2015-01-05T16:32:06","slug":"better-data-would-lead-to-better-decision-making-around-school-choice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/?p=116","title":{"rendered":"Better data would lead to better decision-making around school choice?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) recently published the report, Better Data, Better Decisions: Informing School Choosers to Improve Education Markets.<\/em> The AEI\u00a0<\/em>argues that better data would lead to better decision-making around school choice for parents, presumably strengthening good schools and allowing families to steer clear of low-quality schools. This report was reviewed by the National Education Policy Center<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

The AEI report provides a thoughtful reflection on, and assessment of, school choice decision-making. It reviews a number of different efforts to engage stakeholders in the school choice process. Ultimately, while the report does offer concrete suggestions aimed at improving the quality of school choice decision-making, it does not successfully argue that increasing choice will increase school quality overall. The report does recognize that many school-choice decisions are made based on informal networks and criteria that researchers have had difficulty identifying and evaluating.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

This 16-page report (Better-Data-Better-Decisions<\/a>)\u00a0 asserts that choice is seen as a mechanism, and at times a panacea, for better educational quality. Given the intense interest in choice as a reform strategy, the report promises to provide an \u201cempirical look at how governments and other third-party organizations can help inform families about their school choice options\u201d (p. i). The report considers how to better inform choosers. Recognizing that no choice is ever perfectly informed, the report provides background on choice theory, focusing on the notion of \u201cbounded rationality.\u201d What this means is \u201cdecision making happens in contexts in which people lack relevant information about their options, have finite time to commit to collecting that information and are limited in their abilities to process and use what information they have\u201d (p.2). The author argues that school choice is not an entirely \u201crational\u201d decision but is shaped by 1) the context within which the choice is made, 2) the background of the chooser, and 3) the available information.<\/p>\n

The report provides an overview of what families want from schools, where they get information on schools, and how they use information to make decisions. This section of the report relies on research conducted by the author. He notes that most information on what families want from their children\u2019s schools is based on survey data which, while useful in some respects, does not take into account desirability bias: the tendency of respondents to respond in ways they think they are \u201csupposed to.\u201d The report suggests that other\u00a0factors (such as accessibility and information from social networks) are actually more influential in real-life decision-making. It further argues that preferences and desires are malleable: they can change over time and in light of available information.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

The report asserts that research on school choice has described two main sources of information: social and formal. Parents talk to other parents and make decisions based on these conversations. Some parents also consider other sources of information, including school districts, governmental entities, and non-governmental third parties. Two critical points the report makes about families\u2019 ability to gather information are: 1) the quality of information available through social networks is heavily influenced by social class, with more well-to-do families typically having access to better information, and 2) the way information is presented (timing, format, amount, source) influences the capacity of the student or parent to use the information effectively. The report notes that finding ways to cut through \u201cdata smog\u201d to determine what information is reliable, good, and relevant is a primary challenge. Lastly, the report addresses the challenge posed by the fact that, especially for middle and high school students, there are multiple decision makers (parents and students) who come to the process with different informational needs and desires. The report addresses the challenge of helping parents and students make good decisions that prioritize academic quality.<\/p>\n

The report concludes with a series of recommendations presented in the language of bounded rationality; that is, the author advocates solutions that take into account the imperfect human reality of decision-making and that improve the odds that parents and students will make \u201cgood\u201d decisions by providing them with good information in a timely fashion in an accessible format. The report encourages families to actually make a choice\u2014 to consider the myriad options available to them rather than \u201cchoosing\u201d those most readily accessible (convenient) to them or passively accepting the schools selected by others in their social network. Those interested in improving student and parental decision-making are encouraged to be accurate in their information, to provide it in an accessible format, and to accommodate the imperfect reality of real people making hard choices that balance many fac\"Window_en_www_aei_org_wp-content_uploads_2014_11_Better-Data-Better-Decisions-4_pdf\"tors beyond a school\u2019s academic quality.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

AEI\u2019s Better Data report is grounded in both the extant literature on school choice and the author\u2019s own research. Beginning with a useful introduction to the concept of \u201cbounded rationality,\u201d the report goes on to review recent research on choice generally and school choice specifically. The report relies on the literature from psychology, economics, and education to provide the reader with an understanding of work on choice and decision- making generally as well as on school choice in particular.<\/p>\n

The author presents findings from two studies he conducted: an Online Experiments Study<\/em> and a Field Experiments Study<\/em>. The methods and findings for both studies are presented in sep\"field\"arate text boxes in the report, while conclusions drawn from the research are embedded in the report.<\/p>\n

The Online Experiments Study used an online survey of 1,000 adults to understand how individuals use numerical ratings of components of school quality and parent comments.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) recently published the report, Better Data, Better Decisions: Informing School Choosers to Improve Education Markets. The AEI\u00a0argues that better data would lead to better decision-making around school choice for parents, presumably strengthening good schools and allowing families to steer clear of low-quality schools. This report was reviewed by the National … Lees verder Better data would lead to better decision-making around school choice?<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-116","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4e5oc-1S","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=116"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":126,"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116\/revisions\/126"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/janbri.nl\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}